Impact of Customizable Columns on User Behavior
Q4 2024 - Q1 2025
As Lead UX Researcher, I spearheaded the quantitative analysis of column usage, applying statistical methods (e.g., t-tests, correlation analysis) to uncover behavioral shifts and deliver data-driven recommendations for UI optimization and feature enhancement.
This quantitative UX research analyzed financial advisor interactions with customizable data columns (approx. 1000 user sessions) in a trading platform. By statistically comparing pre and post-feature delivery data, the study identified significant shifts in column usage, saved view creation (788% increase), and information hierarchy, providing actionable insights for optimizing the platform's information architecture and improving user workflow efficiency.
Financial advisors were drowning in data. The trading platform presented a vast array of columns, but this often led to information overload, hampering quick decision-making and efficient workflow management. The existing system lacked the flexibility to easily tailor data views to specific analytical needs.
Too many columns, too little clarity?
Advisors struggled to manage and interpret over 50+ potential data columns, making it difficult to isolate critical information quickly.
Was column setup a time sink?
Default column layouts were often suboptimal, forcing users into repetitive manual adjustments and slowing down analysis (avg. 24+ mins/session).
Could users truly make the view 'theirs'?
Limited and cumbersome customization meant users couldn't easily save or switch between tailored views for different tasks, with only 22% using saved configurations.
The challenge was clear: empower advisors by transforming data display from a rigid structure into a flexible, personalized tool. This research aimed to understand their core needs to build a system that surfaces the right data at the right time, effortlessly.
We aimed to understand how financial advisors actually use columns in their daily workflows to optimize the information architecture and improve the overall user experience with data presentation.
To analyze how the introduction of customizable columns shifted user interaction patterns and column usage.
How did the introduction of customizable columns affect overall user behavior and workflow efficiency?
Which specific columns saw the most significant changes in usage frequency (increase/decrease) post-customization?
What were the key differences in column interaction patterns (e.g., sorting, visibility) before and after the feature update?
To identify common patterns in how users created and utilized saved column templates and configured their views.
What patterns emerged in the creation and usage of saved column templates (e.g., common column groupings, naming conventions)?
How did the visibility and prioritization of specific columns change within user-customized views?
What correlations were observed between different types of columns being used together in custom configurations?
To translate behavioral insights into actionable recommendations for improving default settings and future enhancements.
How can insights into frequent column combinations and saved templates inform better default column arrangements?
What are the actionable design implications for improving the discoverability and usability of less-utilized but potentially valuable columns?
Based on observed behaviors, what future enhancements or new features could further optimize the column customization experience?
These research questions were strategically formulated to bridge the gap between observing raw user behavior with customizable columns and deriving actionable design principles. By dissecting how users adapted to, configured, and valued different data points, we aimed to establish an empirical basis for refining the platform's information architecture. The answers to these questions directly informed the quantitative usage analysis, comparative behavioral studies, and pattern mining methods employed, ensuring that our subsequent research efforts were laser-focused on creating a more intuitive and efficient user experience.
To understand advisor interaction with data columns and drive UI optimization, we employed a multi-faceted quantitative approach.
Tracking Column Interactions at Scale
Analysis of approximately 1000 user sessions, focusing on column visibility, interaction frequency (e.g., sorting, filtering), and configuration patterns within the trading platform's 'Account and Groups' tab.
What this revealed: This large-scale analysis provided a clear picture of which columns advisors used most, ignored, or struggled with, forming the basis for data-driven UI improvements.
Usage Frequencies (~1k sessions)
Pre/Post Customizable Column Feature
Statistical comparison (t-tests) of column usage metrics (M=79.3 to M=67.2) before and after the introduction of customizable columns, demonstrating a significant shift (p=.001) in user interaction patterns.
What this revealed: By comparing behavior, we precisely measured the impact of the new customization feature, confirming users were adapting workflows and identifying where adoption was strongest.
Column Usage Shift
Discovering Common User Setups
Identification of frequently co-occurring columns in user-saved views through correlation analysis, revealing common information grouping strategies and workflow-specific data needs.
What this revealed: This helped us understand *how* advisors organized their information, uncovering natural data relationships that could inform better default layouts and template suggestions.
Saved View Patterns
Measuring Impact of New Columns
Measuring the adoption rate of newly introduced columns (e.g., 'SWP Amount' at 29%) and the overall engagement with customization features, evidenced by a 788% increase in saved view creation.
What this revealed: Quantified the success of new features and the general appetite for customization, highlighting which additions were most impactful and where further user education might be needed.
Adoption & Engagement Increase
Foundation for Process: These quantitative methods (Usage Analysis, Pre/Post Comparison, Pattern Mining, Adoption Tracking) formed the backbone of our research. They allowed us to statistically measure behavioral shifts, identify user-preferred configurations, and quantify the impact of new features, directly informing UI optimizations for column management.
Our data-driven approach to understanding column usage patterns and optimizing workflows
Column Usage Analysis
Data Extraction
Power BI Visualization
Pattern Recognition
PM Implementation
Analyzed which columns are used extensively by financial advisors and identified potential template combinations to streamline workflows.
Located and extracted scattered data from multiple databases, untangling complex JSON file structures using Power Query.
Imported processed data into Power BI for cleaning and visualization to understand column usage patterns by different user types.
Applied machine learning and regression analysis to identify meaningful connections between column selections and user behaviors.
Delivered comprehensive data and visualizations to product managers, enabling them to create more effective column management components.
Our analysis of approximately 1000 user sessions revealed critical insights into how financial advisors interact with AG Grid column configurations
A 788% surge in weekly saved view creation (from 1.8 to 14.2) followed new capabilities, with 100s of new unique views created in three months, showing strong adoption.
Original column usage significantly dropped (Mean: 79.3 to 67.2, p=.001) as users adapted workflows to the new customizable options.
Adoption of new columns was selective. 'SWP Amount' was most used (29% of views), while 'Est Tax Rate' saw minimal uptake (4%).
Consistent naming significantly influenced column co-usage. Related terms like 'PIP', 'SWP', 'G/L' were frequently grouped, aiding discoverability.
The analysis revealed a dramatic increase in saved view creation (788%) and identified opportunities to improve column discoverability through consistent terminology. New columns showed selective adoption patterns, with SWP Amount leading at 29% usage.
How our column management system redesign transformed data workflows and delivered measurable efficiency gains
Users spent 14.5 min/day managing columns
68% frequently recreated similar column sets
73% struggled finding relevant columns
Created intelligent column grouping system
Built template system with one-click application
Implemented AI-driven column search & suggestions
83% reduction in column configuration time
Templates shared across teams increased 217%
94% of users reported easier data access
Annual time savings across the organization from streamlined column management and template sharing.
Decrease in data interpretation errors due to consistent column templates and better organization.
Productivity gains and improved decision-making translated into significant cost savings.
Manual column selection for each new analysis
No ability to save or share configurations
Difficult column discovery with 500+ options
One-click application of saved configurations
Enterprise template library with 350+ templates
Smart search with predictive suggestions
Outlines the research framework for evaluating impact of platform deliveries on user workflows.
Defines both quantitative and qualitative research approaches for column usage analysis.
Establishes methodology for integrating insights to understand user adoption behavior.