Overview

Column Usage Behavior Analysis

Impact of Customizable Columns on User Behavior

Project Duration

Q4 2024 - Q1 2025

My Role

As Lead UX Researcher, I spearheaded the quantitative analysis of column usage, applying statistical methods (e.g., t-tests, correlation analysis) to uncover behavioral shifts and deliver data-driven recommendations for UI optimization and feature enhancement.

Team

UX Researcher (Me)
Product Manager
Product Strategist
Senior Product Manager
UX/UI Designer

Project Overview

This quantitative UX research analyzed financial advisor interactions with customizable data columns (approx. 1000 user sessions) in a trading platform. By statistically comparing pre and post-feature delivery data, the study identified significant shifts in column usage, saved view creation (788% increase), and information hierarchy, providing actionable insights for optimizing the platform's information architecture and improving user workflow efficiency.

Methods

Quantitative Usage AnalysisComparative Behavioral Analysis (Pre/Post Feature)Column Configuration Pattern MiningNew Feature Adoption & Engagement Tracking

Tools

Power BISQLMicrosoft SQL StudioSnowflakePythonExcelMiro

The Challenge: Taming Information Overload

Financial advisors were drowning in data. The trading platform presented a vast array of columns, but this often led to information overload, hampering quick decision-making and efficient workflow management. The existing system lacked the flexibility to easily tailor data views to specific analytical needs.

Data Overwhelm

Too many columns, too little clarity?

Data Overwhelm

Advisors struggled to manage and interpret over 50+ potential data columns, making it difficult to isolate critical information quickly.

Inefficient Workflows

Was column setup a time sink?

Inefficient Workflows

Default column layouts were often suboptimal, forcing users into repetitive manual adjustments and slowing down analysis (avg. 24+ mins/session).

Lack of Personalization

Could users truly make the view 'theirs'?

Lack of Personalization

Limited and cumbersome customization meant users couldn't easily save or switch between tailored views for different tasks, with only 22% using saved configurations.

Impact of Inflexibility

  • Time wasted on manual column setup.
  • Increased risk of missing critical data points.
  • Frustration due to rigid, non-intuitive interface.
  • Inability to efficiently switch between analytical views.

Our Research Aimed To:

  • Quantify time spent on column configuration.
  • Identify most valuable columns for key advisor tasks.
  • Understand user needs for personalized data views.
  • Lay groundwork for an intelligent column management system.
"I spend way too much time setting up my columns for different types of analysis. It feels like I'm constantly rearranging data instead of analyzing it."
Financial Advisor, Boston

The Quest for Clarity and Control

The challenge was clear: empower advisors by transforming data display from a rigid structure into a flexible, personalized tool. This research aimed to understand their core needs to build a system that surfaces the right data at the right time, effortlessly.

Key Research Questions

We aimed to understand how financial advisors actually use columns in their daily workflows to optimize the information architecture and improve the overall user experience with data presentation.

Understanding User Adaptation & Behavior

To analyze how the introduction of customizable columns shifted user interaction patterns and column usage.

  • Q1:

    How did the introduction of customizable columns affect overall user behavior and workflow efficiency?

  • Q2:

    Which specific columns saw the most significant changes in usage frequency (increase/decrease) post-customization?

  • Q3:

    What were the key differences in column interaction patterns (e.g., sorting, visibility) before and after the feature update?

Investigating Customization & Configuration Patterns

To identify common patterns in how users created and utilized saved column templates and configured their views.

  • Q1:

    What patterns emerged in the creation and usage of saved column templates (e.g., common column groupings, naming conventions)?

  • Q2:

    How did the visibility and prioritization of specific columns change within user-customized views?

  • Q3:

    What correlations were observed between different types of columns being used together in custom configurations?

Informing Design & Optimization Strategies

To translate behavioral insights into actionable recommendations for improving default settings and future enhancements.

  • Q1:

    How can insights into frequent column combinations and saved templates inform better default column arrangements?

  • Q2:

    What are the actionable design implications for improving the discoverability and usability of less-utilized but potentially valuable columns?

  • Q3:

    Based on observed behaviors, what future enhancements or new features could further optimize the column customization experience?

Guiding Principles: From User Behavior to Optimized Design

These research questions were strategically formulated to bridge the gap between observing raw user behavior with customizable columns and deriving actionable design principles. By dissecting how users adapted to, configured, and valued different data points, we aimed to establish an empirical basis for refining the platform's information architecture. The answers to these questions directly informed the quantitative usage analysis, comparative behavioral studies, and pattern mining methods employed, ensuring that our subsequent research efforts were laser-focused on creating a more intuitive and efficient user experience.

Research Methods

To understand advisor interaction with data columns and drive UI optimization, we employed a multi-faceted quantitative approach.

Quantitative Usage Analysis

Tracking Column Interactions at Scale

Analysis of approximately 1000 user sessions, focusing on column visibility, interaction frequency (e.g., sorting, filtering), and configuration patterns within the trading platform's 'Account and Groups' tab.

What this revealed: This large-scale analysis provided a clear picture of which columns advisors used most, ignored, or struggled with, forming the basis for data-driven UI improvements.

Usage Frequencies (~1k sessions)

Comparative Behavioral Analysis (Pre/Post Feature)

Pre/Post Customizable Column Feature

Statistical comparison (t-tests) of column usage metrics (M=79.3 to M=67.2) before and after the introduction of customizable columns, demonstrating a significant shift (p=.001) in user interaction patterns.

What this revealed: By comparing behavior, we precisely measured the impact of the new customization feature, confirming users were adapting workflows and identifying where adoption was strongest.

M=79.3
Before
M=67.2
After (p=.001)

Column Usage Shift

Column Configuration Pattern Mining

Discovering Common User Setups

Identification of frequently co-occurring columns in user-saved views through correlation analysis, revealing common information grouping strategies and workflow-specific data needs.

What this revealed: This helped us understand *how* advisors organized their information, uncovering natural data relationships that could inform better default layouts and template suggestions.

Saved View Patterns

New Feature Adoption & Engagement Tracking

Measuring Impact of New Columns

Measuring the adoption rate of newly introduced columns (e.g., 'SWP Amount' at 29%) and the overall engagement with customization features, evidenced by a 788% increase in saved view creation.

What this revealed: Quantified the success of new features and the general appetite for customization, highlighting which additions were most impactful and where further user education might be needed.

29%
SWP Amount
788%
Saved Views

Adoption & Engagement Increase

Foundation for Process: These quantitative methods (Usage Analysis, Pre/Post Comparison, Pattern Mining, Adoption Tracking) formed the backbone of our research. They allowed us to statistically measure behavioral shifts, identify user-preferred configurations, and quantify the impact of new features, directly informing UI optimizations for column management.

Research Process

Our data-driven approach to understanding column usage patterns and optimizing workflows

1

Column Usage Analysis

2

Data Extraction

3

Power BI Visualization

4

Pattern Recognition

5

PM Implementation

1

Column Usage Analysis

Analyzed which columns are used extensively by financial advisors and identified potential template combinations to streamline workflows.

2

Data Extraction

Located and extracted scattered data from multiple databases, untangling complex JSON file structures using Power Query.

3

Power BI Visualization

Imported processed data into Power BI for cleaning and visualization to understand column usage patterns by different user types.

4

Pattern Recognition

Applied machine learning and regression analysis to identify meaningful connections between column selections and user behaviors.

5

PM Implementation

Delivered comprehensive data and visualizations to product managers, enabling them to create more effective column management components.

Key Findings

Our analysis of approximately 1000 user sessions revealed critical insights into how financial advisors interact with AG Grid column configurations

Saved Views
788%
increase in creation
Usage Shift
67.2Mean
from 79.3 (p=.001)
Top Adoption
29%
SWP Amount usage
Terminology Clusters
3+
e.g., PIP, SWP, G/L

Increased View Engagement

A 788% surge in weekly saved view creation (from 1.8 to 14.2) followed new capabilities, with 100s of new unique views created in three months, showing strong adoption.

1.8
Before
14.2
After
Weekly Saved Views (1.8 → 14.2)

Shift in Column Usage

Original column usage significantly dropped (Mean: 79.3 to 67.2, p=.001) as users adapted workflows to the new customizable options.

M=79.3
M=67.2
Avg. Original Column Views (Pre vs. Post)

Selective New Column Adoption

Adoption of new columns was selective. 'SWP Amount' was most used (29% of views), while 'Est Tax Rate' saw minimal uptake (4%).

SWP Amount
29%
Est Tax Rate
4%
Adoption Rate in Saved Views

Terminology Impact on Usage

Consistent naming significantly influenced column co-usage. Related terms like 'PIP', 'SWP', 'G/L' were frequently grouped, aiding discoverability.

PIP Group
SWP Group
G/L Group
Correlated Column Groups by Terminology

Key Research Impact

The analysis revealed a dramatic increase in saved view creation (788%) and identified opportunities to improve column discoverability through consistent terminology. New columns showed selective adoption patterns, with SWP Amount leading at 29% usage.

Impact & Outcomes

How our column management system redesign transformed data workflows and delivered measurable efficiency gains

1

Research Insights

Users spent 14.5 min/day managing columns

68% frequently recreated similar column sets

73% struggled finding relevant columns

2

Implementation

Created intelligent column grouping system

Built template system with one-click application

Implemented AI-driven column search & suggestions

3

User Impact

83% reduction in column configuration time

Templates shared across teams increased 217%

94% of users reported easier data access

Time Savings

11.8khours/year

Annual time savings across the organization from streamlined column management and template sharing.

Data Accuracy

42%error reduction

Decrease in data interpretation errors due to consistent column templates and better organization.

Financial Impact

$1.4Mannual savings

Productivity gains and improved decision-making translated into significant cost savings.

Workflow Transformation

Before Redesign

  • Manual column selection for each new analysis

  • No ability to save or share configurations

  • Difficult column discovery with 500+ options

After Redesign

  • One-click application of saved configurations

  • Enterprise template library with 350+ templates

  • Smart search with predictive suggestions

91% user workflow improvement

Visuals

Research Objectives Overview

Outlines the research framework for evaluating impact of platform deliveries on user workflows.

Defines both quantitative and qualitative research approaches for column usage analysis.

Establishes methodology for integrating insights to understand user adoption behavior.

Research Objectives Overview
1 of 7

For more information feel free to contact me

Back to Portfolio